Argument Selection: 2AC Drill

Learning Objectives

  • Introduce fundamentals of argument selection.

  • Apply principles of argument selection to arguments from the AUDL evidence packet.

Time Needed

~30 min.

Resources & Materials

  • Paper (2-3 sheets per student)

  • Pencil/pen (1 per student)

  • Evidence packet (1 per student)

Teacher Preparation

  • Review principles of argument selection, per the AUDL curriculum.

  • Select (and review) a 1NC disadvantage shell and its associated 2AC block.

Lesson Outline

  • Argument Selection – 2AC Drill (Activity)
    • To begin, divide students into small groups (2-3 students).
      • Assign one advanced student to each group (if possible).
      • Ask each group to select a representative to deliver a short speech.
    • Give each group a short period of time to review the 1NC disadvantage shell.
      • Call on each group to explain a different component of the disadvantage.
      • Flow each part of the disadvantage on the board.
      • Shorten this part as necessary.
    • Once the DA review is complete, ask each group to analyze its associated 2AC block.
      • Each group should select one argument from the 2AC block and prepare a short speech (no more than 1:30) giving three reasons supporting its selection.
    • Once the speeches are prepared, ask each group to present its speech.
      • Flow each speech on the board.
      • At the end of the activity, your goal is to have a list of positive “prodicts” for each argument.
  • Argument Selection – 2AC Drill (Reflection)
    • Give a short lecture introducing the fundamentals of Argument Selection.
      • Reference the content provided by the squad as much as possible.
      • Using the “prodicts” provided for each argument, create a list of the following:
        • Characteristics of a good argument that SHOULD be extended.
        • Characteristics of a bad argument that should NOT be extended.
    • Students often have difficulty with argument selection. This activity is successful if:
      • Less experienced students understand they should MAKE CHOICES during a debate.
      • More advanced students understand the basics of HOW to MAKE CHOICES during a debate.

Points of Improvement

  • Students focus on the content of an argument, not its role in the broader debate.

  • Students do not understand the difference between argument quality and strategic value.

Signs of Mastery

  • Students understand they must make choices and have a basic framework for doing so.

Instructor Notes

  • This activity is best for intermediate/advanced students.
  • Argument selection can be VERY DIFFICULT for students to understand.
    • If students understand that they should MAKE CHOICES by the end of the activity, you’ve succeeded.
  • Watch your time! This activity has multiple parts.

Next Lesson Plan: Pick One!