Counterplans: Net Benn Diagram

Learning Objectives

  • Introduce parts of a counterplan.

Time Needed

~10-15 min.

Resources & Materials

  • Expo markers/chalk

Teacher Preparation

  • Come up with a hypothetical plan with a specific problem in mind.
    • Example: Plan: The USFG should raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour.
    • Example: Plan: The USFG should fully subsidize public transportation.

Lesson Outline

  • Net Benn Diagram (Activity)
    • Create three columns on the board: “Affirmative Plan”, “Negative Counterplan”, and “Net Benefit”.
    • Write the plan prepared beforehand under “Affirmative Plan”.
      • In parentheses, write whatever problem the plan is meant to solve (e.g., poverty).
    • Ask the students to brainstorm other options to solve whatever problem the plan would solve. Write their ideas under “Negative Counterplan”.
      • Make sure students understand that their ideas do not have to seem like another affirmative plan (their plans can use actors other than the USFG, for example).
      • If students struggle to come up with ideas, some generic counterplans you can add are:
        • The 50 states should [whatever the plan does].
        • The president should [do whatever the plan does] via an executive order.
        • Consult NATO/Japan/UN/etc. before doing the plan.
    • After students have come up with some counterplans, ask them what makes their ideas preferable to doing the affirmative plan, and write their responses under “Net Benefit”.
      • In addition to more obvious benefits like being more cost-effective or better resolving the problem, net benefits can be that the counterplan avoids something bad that the affirmative plan doesn’t (often a disadvantage impact).
        • Ex. The 50 states CP doesn’t undermine state autonomy (avoids Federalism DA).
        • Ex. A consult CP avoids upsetting US allies.
  • Introduction to Counterplan Structure
    • Explain that all counterplans have 3 parts:
      • Counterplan text: the specific policy proposal.
      • Solvency advocate: evidence on how the counterplan solves the affirmative advantage(s).
      • Net benefit: What makes the counterplan preferable to the plan.
        • The net benefit is often, but not always, not linking to a disadvantage.
        • Use examples from the activity.

Points of Improvement

  • Students struggle to come up with net benefits for their counterplans.

Signs of Mastery

  • Students can explain why there’s a distinct reason that doing the counterplan is preferable to doing the affirmative plan.

Instructor Notes

  • This activity works well as a warm-up.

    • Coming up with multiple plans makes this an easy activity to repeat.

Next Lesson Plan: STOP and Think